MANAGED SONARQUBE
SAST and quality gates that fail the PR — operated for you.
The proven open-source code analyzer, deployed in your cloud, tuned to under 5% false positives, and run by senior engineers on a 4-hour SLA. SonarQube Server, Developer or Enterprise edition, Postgres sized to grow, CI wired to your stack.
What you get
A SAST platform that engineers stop ignoring.
SAST that fails the PR
Quality gates block merges on new critical issues, dropped coverage, or new security findings. Developers see the failure inside the pull request, in context, while the code is still warm.
Taint analysis, not pattern matching
Interprocedural data-flow tracking from sources (HTTP params, file reads) to sinks (SQL, shell, response writers). SQL injection, XSS, command injection, SSRF — caught before they ship.
Secrets detection in CI and IDE
Cloud keys, database connection strings, JWTs, private keys. Caught pre-commit in the IDE via SonarLint and post-commit in the CI scan. Push-protection workflow tuned to your providers.
40+ languages and IaC formats
Java, C#, Python, JavaScript, TypeScript, Go, Kotlin, Rust, PHP, Ruby. Plus Terraform, Kubernetes, CloudFormation, Docker. Enterprise tier adds C/C++, Swift, Apex, COBOL, T-SQL.
False-positive rate below 5%
SonarSource's measured rate is 3.2% on reviewed issues. We tune your quality gate to score only on new code, so legacy noise stays out of every developer's daily review.
You can read the code
It is open-source. Every rule, every analyzer, every detection. If we part ways, the stack stays. No proprietary scan format, no hostage history, no annual price-rise letter.
SonarQube vs Snyk / Veracode
The like-for-like comparison.
Per-developer commercial pricing scales with headcount. SonarQube Server is licensed per-LOC and per-instance, so adding engineers does not move the bill. [1]
How we operate
Four phases. One named engineer.
Assess
Two-week engagement. We threat-model your stack, audit existing CI, and pick the right SonarQube edition for your LOC and language mix. You get a deployment plan and a price before we touch infrastructure.
Deploy
SonarQube Server in your cloud (or ours, your call). Postgres sized for 18 months of growth. Elasticsearch heap and disk sized to clear the 95% read-only watermark. CI scanners wired into GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, or Azure DevOps.
Tune
Quality gates set to score on new code only. Per-language rule sets reviewed and pruned. Ninety-day target: developer-visible false-positive rate under 5%, the threshold below which engineers stop ignoring the tool.
Operate
Patching on the SonarSource LTA cadence. Postgres vacuum and index health monitored. Stale branch purge automation. 4-hour critical SLA. Monthly posture review with the engineer who owns your instance.
ROI — 50 developers, 2M LOC
The mid-tier math, line by line.
Like-for-like vs Snyk Ignite
- Snyk Ignite, 50 contributing developers × $1,260/dev/year$63,000 / yr
- GitHub Advanced Security, 50 active committers × $49/month × 12 (SAST + secrets only)$29,400 / yr
- ThinSky-managed SonarQube Developer Edition, 2M LOC tier (license + infra + 24/7 ops, midpoint)$48,000 / yr
- Annual differential vs Snyk Ignite−$15,000 / yr[5]
SonarQube also adds quality-gate-driven PR blocking and code-smell coverage, which Snyk Code does not provide. GHAS is the cheaper line item at this scale, but covers SAST and secrets only — no code quality, no portfolio rollup, no self-host. Numbers from the dossier; vendor list-price snapshots, 2025–2026.
The honest objections
Five questions every buyer asks.
Open source means no support, no SLA, no one to call at 2 AM.
True for the unmanaged Community Build. False under a managed contract. We provide named senior engineers, a 4-hour critical SLA, and patch ownership through SonarSource's LTA release cadence. The software is open-source. The operation is contracted.
Snyk's developer experience is just better.
It is, in the IDE — for security-only, for small teams. Snyk's VS Code plugin is best-in-class. SonarQube wins past about 50 developers, where you also need quality gates, code-smell coverage, and per-LOC economics that don't grow linearly with headcount.
We're a GitHub shop. Why not just buy GitHub Advanced Security?
If you're under 100 active committers and live entirely on GitHub.com, GHAS at $30 + $19 per committer per month is the cleanest integration on the market. The math flips at scale — 200 committers is $117,600/year for SAST and secrets only, with no code-quality coverage.
We tried SonarQube three years ago. The false positives killed adoption.
Almost always a configuration issue, not an engine issue. The fix is the new-code-only quality gate, which most early adopters never set correctly. Mature teams hit under 5% developer-visible false positives in 60-90 days. SonarSource's measured rate is 3.2% on reviewed issues.
I need a signed compliance attestation for my customer.
SonarQube produces detailed security reports aligned with OWASP Top 10 and CWE Top 25, sufficient for most SOC 2 and ISO 27001 audits when paired with a SOC 2 report from the operator. If your contract literally names Veracode, buy Veracode. If it says "industry-standard SAST," SonarQube qualifies.
Ship code through a gate that holds.
30-minute call with a senior engineer. We'll map your current SAST stack, your LOC tier, and what a managed SonarQube rollout looks like in your CI.
Talk to a Code-Security Engineer →